Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
ALABAMA v. FINCH, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE, et al., 1970 — 396 U.S. 552 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
ALABAMA v. FINCH, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE, et al.
396 U.S. 552·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ALABAMA v. FINCH, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE, et al.
No. 38,
Orig.
Decided February 2, 1970
Albert P. Brewer, Governor of Alabama, Daniel J. Meador, and Maüry D. Smith on the motion.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
On January 26, 1970, the plaintiff filed a motion seeking leave to file a complaint invoking the original jurisdiction of this Court naming Robert Finch, as Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, and John N. Mitchell, as Attorney General of the United States, as defendants.
The alleged emergent nature of the claims for relief led the Court to give expedited consideration to the motion and proffered complaint and, having examined the complaint, we conclude it fails to state a claim against either of the defendants warranting the exercise of the original jurisdiction of this Court.
Accordingly, the motion for leave to file the said complaint is denied.