Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corpus Christi Independent School District et al. v. Cisneros et al., 1973 — 413 U.S. 922 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Corpus Christi Independent School District et al. v. Cisneros et al.
413 U.S. 922·Supreme Court of the United States·1973
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 72-649.
Corpus Christi Independent School District et al. v. Cisneros et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Stewart, Mr. Justice Blackmun, and Mr. Justice Rehnquist, feeling that no useful purpose is to be served by-setting the case for oral argument, would nevertheless grant the petition, vacate the judgment, and remand case for further consideration in light of Keyes v. School District No. 1, ante, p. 189.