Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES of America v. Charles WITT, 1934 — 68 F.2d 1017 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES of America v. Charles WITT
68 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America v. Charles WITT.
No. 5134.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Jan. 18, 1934.
Before EVANS, SPARKS, and FITZ HENRY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On motion of Edward A. Fisher, assistant United States attorney, counsel for appellant, it is now here ordered by this court that this» cause be docketed in this court instanter, and that this appeal bo, and the same is hereby, dismissed.