Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Albert GUTTERMAN, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, 1928 — 25 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
General
Albert GUTTERMAN, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES
25 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Albert GUTTERMAN, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
January 30, 1928.
No. 7897.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma.
Kelly Brown and Harry G. Davis, both of Muskogee, Okl., for plaintiff in error.
Frank Lee, U. S. Atty., and W. F. Rampendahl, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Muskogee, Okl.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Writ of error dismissed, without costs to either party in this court, on motion of plaintiff in error.