Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
L. R. CONNETT & COMPANY, Inc., Libelant-Appellee, v. Steam Tugs THE SENATOR RICE and THE HERCULES, Their Engines, etc., Cornell Steamboat Company, Claimant-Appellant, The Steamer Lexington, Her Engines, etc., Colonial Navigation Company, Claimant-Appellee; CORNELL STEAMBOAT COMPANY, Libelant-Appellant, v. THE Steamer LEXINGTON, Her Engines, etc., Colonial Navigation Company, Claimant-Appellee, 1931 — 53 F.2d 1083 · caselaw · US
General
L. R. CONNETT & COMPANY, Inc., Libelant-Appellee, v. Steam Tugs THE SENATOR RICE and THE HERCULES, Their Engines, etc., Cornell Steamboat Company, Claimant-Appellant, The Steamer Lexington, Her Engines, etc., Colonial Navigation Company, Claimant-Appellee; CORNELL STEAMBOAT COMPANY, Libelant-Appellant, v. THE Steamer LEXINGTON, Her Engines, etc., Colonial Navigation Company, Claimant-Appellee
53 F.2d 1083·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
L. R. CONNETT & COMPANY, Inc., Libelant-Appellee, v. Steam Tugs THE SENATOR RICE and THE HERCULES, Their Engines, etc., Cornell Steamboat Company, Claimant-Appellant, The Steamer Lexington, Her Engines, etc., Colonial Navigation Company, Claimant-Appellee. CORNELL STEAMBOAT COMPANY, Libelant-Appellant, v. THE Steamer LEXINGTON, Her Engines, etc., Colonial Navigation Company, Claimant-Appellee.
Nos. 7, 8.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Oct. 19, 1931.
Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox, Keating So McGrann, of New York City (Robert S. Erskine and Henry. P. Elliott, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Burlingham, Veeder, Fearey, Clark So Hupper, of New York City (Chauncey I. Clark and P. Fearson Shortridge, both of New York City, of counsel), for claimantappellee.
Macklin, Brown, Lenahan So Speer, of New York City (Horace L. Cheyney, of New York City, of counsel), for libelant-appellee.
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decision and decrees, 43 F.(2d) 719, affirmed.