Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bingler Vacation Tours, Inc. v. United States et al., 1955 — 350 U.S. 921 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Bingler Vacation Tours, Inc. v. United States et al.
350 U.S. 921·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 444.
Bingler Vacation Tours, Inc. v. United States et al.
Wilmer A. Hill for appellant. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and James F. X. O’Brien and Jack R. Turney, Jr. for the Asbury Park-New York Transit Corporation et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey.
Per Curiam:
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.