Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
McNabb et al. v. United States, 1942 — 316 U.S. 658 · caselaw · US
General
McNabb et al. v. United States
316 U.S. 658·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 949.
McNabb et al. v. United States.
June 8, 1942.
Benjamin McNabb, Freeman McNabb and Raymond McNabb, pro se. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs. Oscar A. Provost and W. Marvin Smith for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is granted. The Court directs that the expense of printing the record be paid by the United States, pursuant to 28 U. S. C., § 832.