Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SCHLUDE et ux., 1961 — 367 U.S. 911 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SCHLUDE et ux.
367 U.S. 911·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SCHLUDE et ux.
No. 629.
Decided June 19, 1961.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General-Rice, Harry Baum and George F. Lynch for petitioner.
Robert Ash and Carl F. Bauersfeld for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in the light of American Automobile Association v. United States, ante, p. 687.
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.