Contracts · MBE-tested
In re McGRIGOR et al. ALASKA PERSEVERANCE MINING CO. v. PEARCE
191 F. 1004·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1911
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re McGRIGOR et al. ALASKA PERSEVERANCE MINING CO. v. PEARCE.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
December 4, 1911.)
Nos. 1,932, 1,947.
Appeals froixi the District Court of the United States for Division No. 1 of the District of Alaska.
For former opinions, see 186 Fed. 783; 186 Fed. 787.
In Nq. 1,932: G. C. Israel, for appellee.
In No. 1,947: R. F. Laffoon, W. C. Sharpfetein, George Clark, John R. Winn, and Newark L. Bxxrton, for appellant.
Grant I-I. Smith, G. C. Israel, and, J. A. Hellenthal, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On motion of counsel for appellee, and on consideration of stipulations of counsel filed November 20 and December 4, 1911, motion granted, and appeals dismissed.