Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William H. Flannery et al., Respondents, v. The Cornell Steamboat Company, Appellant, 1898 — 155 N.Y. 692 · caselaw · US
General
William H. Flannery et al., Respondents, v. The Cornell Steamboat Company, Appellant
155 N.Y. 692·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William H. Flannery et al., Respondents, v. The Cornell Steamboat Company, Appellant.
Flannery v. Cornell Steamboat Co., 89 Hun, 135, affirmed.
(Argued March 25, 1898;
decided April 19, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered August 7, 1895, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Robert D. Benedict for appellant.
La Roy 8. Gore and James J. Maeldin for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
All concur, except Parker, Oh. J., Gray and O’Brien, JJ., dissenting.