Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SOUTH CAROLINA ex rel. ROBB v. GURNEY, 1873 — 154 U.S. 593 · caselaw · US
General
SOUTH CAROLINA ex rel. ROBB v. GURNEY
154 U.S. 593·Supreme Court of the United States·1873
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SOUTH CAROLINA ex rel. ROBB v. GURNEY.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 22.
Re-argued October 20, 21, 1873.
Decided November 3, 1873.
State v. Stoll, 17 Wall. 425, followed.'
Mr. W. W. Boyce, Mr. A. G. Magrath and Mr. B. It. Curtis for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. D. H. Chamberlain for defendant in errpr.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Hunt]
Mr. Justice Hunt
delivered the opinion of the court.
The same judgment is ordered in this case as in State v. Stoll, 17 Wall. 425.