Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Baltimore & Annapolis Railroad Co. et al., 1939 — 308 U.S. 525 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. Baltimore & Annapolis Railroad Co. et al.
308 U.S. 525·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 78.
United States v. Baltimore & Annapolis Railroad Co. et al.
Argued December 11, 1939.
Decided December 18, 1939.
Assistant Attorney General Shea, with whom Solicitor General Jackson and Messrs. Warner W. Gardner, Paul A. Sweeney, and Enoch E. Ellison were on the brief, for the United States. Mr. Edgar Allan Poe was on a brief for the Baltimore & Annapolis Railroad Co., and Mr. J. Purdon Wright was on a brief for O. E. Weller et al., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Hendrick v. Maryland, 235 U. S. 610, 622-623; Kane v. New Jersey, 242 U. S. 160, 167; Hodge Co. v. Cincinnati, 284 U. S. 335, 337; South Carolina State Highway Dept. v. Barnwell Bros., 303 U. S. 177, 189.