Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Leon Cardenas Martinez, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Texas, 1914 — 232 U.S. 714 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
Leon Cardenas Martinez, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Texas
232 U.S. 714·Supreme Court of the United States·1914
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 356.
Leon Cardenas Martinez, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Texas.
In error to the Court of Criminal Appeals of the State of Texas.
Motion to dismiss submitted December 15, 1913.
Decided January 12, 1914.
Mr. B. F. Looney for the defendant in error. No appearance for the plaintiff in error.
[MAJORITY]
Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Ex parte Siebold, 100. U. S. 371, 375; Ex parte Crouch, 112 U. S. 178; Andrews v. Swartz, 156 U. S. 272; Barrington v. Missouri, 205 U. S. 483; Leeper v. Texas, 139 U. S. 462; Fullerton v. Texas, 196 U. S. 192; McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U. S. 432.