General

Michael Graziadei, Respondent, v. The White Company, Appellant, and Nicholas A. Bell, Defendant

248 A.D. 680·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1936·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Michael Graziadei, Respondent, v. The White Company, Appellant, and Nicholas A. Bell, Defendant. [MAJORITY] Order modified and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: Under the facts presented by appellant, unexplained and unrefuted by respondent, the imposing of the condition contained in the order was unauthorized. All concur. (The order denies motion for dismissal of complaint for failure to prosecute an action for damages sustained by reason of fraud in the purchase of a truck.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.