General
Mary O'Toole, Respondent, v. Central Park, North and East River Railroad Company, Appellant
128 N.Y. 597·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary O’Toole, Respondent, v. Central Park, North and East River Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued June 4, 1891;
decided June 23, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made December 29,1890, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Henry Thompson for appellant.
James F. Higgins for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.