Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joseph Lester Woodbridge et al., Respondents, v. John S. Wise et al., Appellants, 1898 — 155 N.Y. 643 · caselaw · US
General
Joseph Lester Woodbridge et al., Respondents, v. John S. Wise et al., Appellants
155 N.Y. 643·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph Lester Woodbridge et al., Respondents, v. John S. Wise et al., Appellants.
Woodbridge v. Wise, 85 Hun, 617, affirmed.
(Argued January 28, 1898;
decided March 1, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 20, 1895, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon the report of a referee.
Robert L. Harrison for appellants.
Esek Gowen for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Parker, Ch. J., not sitting, and Martin, J., not voting.