Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edward Myers, Respondent, v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company et al., Appellants, 1893 — 138 N.Y. 652 · caselaw · US
Administrative
Edward Myers, Respondent, v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company et al., Appellants
138 N.Y. 652·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward Myers, Respondent, v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company et al., Appellants.
(Argued June 5, 1893;
decided June 13, 1893.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of New York, entered upon an order made June 6, 1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Dmies c& Bapallo for motion.
Henry Schmitt opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to grant motion upon condition that appellants pay to respondent full costs of appeal, as upon argument, to the Court of Appeals; no opinion.
All concur.
Motion granted.