General
Stacy B. Rettenhouse, Appellant, v. Albert D. Winch et al., Respondents
133 N.Y. 678·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Stacy B. Rettenhouse, Appellant, v. Albert D. Winch et al., Respondents.
(Submitted May 25, 1892 ;
decided June 14, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made June 6, 1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Isaac N. Müler for appellant.
John A. Mapes for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion of Daniels, J., below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.