General

Grubb's Executors, versus Grubb's Executors

2 U.S. 1912 Dall. 191·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1792·PA

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Grubb’s Executors, versus Grubb’s Executors. THIS cause being referred in the Common Pleas, the referrees made report into office ; and afterwards the plaintiff removed the cause by certiorari into this Court. But Ingersoll, on behalf of the defendant, now moved for a Procedendo ; alledging that in a case of Pigot v. Young, it had been decided, that a cause could not be removed after the arbitrators, or referees, had entered on the business submitted, or referred, to them. [MAJORITY] And the Court, accordingly, awarded a Procedendo.