Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
BOINEAU et al. v. THORNTON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, et al., 1964 — 379 U.S. 15 · caselaw · US
General
BOINEAU et al. v. THORNTON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, et al.
379 U.S. 15·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BOINEAU et al. v. THORNTON, SECRETARY OF STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, et al.
No. 483.
Decided October 19, 1964.
Ralph E. Becker for appellants.
Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, and Clarence T. Goolsby, Jr., and Everett N. Brandon, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.