General
T. M. James & Sons China Co. v. United States
9 Cust. Ct. 674·United States Customs Court·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
T. M. James & Sons China Co. v. United States
No. 5749.
Entry No. 116-A, etc.
Invoices dated Stoke on Trent, England, September 24, 1941, etc.
Certified September 26, 1941, etc.
Entered at Kansas City, St. Louis, November 26, 1941, etc.
(Order dated October 26, 1942)
Plaintiff not represented by counsel.
Paul P. Bao, Assistant Attorney General (Daniel I. Ausler, special attorney), for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — Oliver, Presiding Judge:]
ORDER
Oliver, Presiding Judge:
Upon reading and filing the notice of motion, dated the 9th day of September, 1942, the affidavit of Maxwell E. Anderson, sworn to on the 28th day of August, 1942, and the memorandum of Paul P. Rao, Assistant Attorney General in charge of Customs, filed in support of said motion, dated the 9th day of September, 1942; and due deliberation having been had thereon.
It is hereby ordered that the appeals for reappraisement in Re-appraisement Nos. 145515-A, 145516-A, 145646-A, 147345-A, and 147346-A, be and the same hereby are dismissed.