General
THE MATANZAS
170 F. 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1909
Before LACOMBE, COXE, and NOYES, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
THE MATANZAS.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 25, 1909.)
No. 264.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
For opinion" below, see 166 Fed. 985.
B,0binson, Biddle & Benedict (W. S. Montgomery, of counsel), for appellant. Wing, Putnam & Burlingham (Charles C. Burlingham, of counsel), for ap-pellee.
Before LACOMBE, COXE, and NOYES, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
There seems to be more than the usual number of contradictions, inconsistencies, and untrustworthy estimates in this record. We are not inclined to reverse the findings of fact or the conclusions of the District Judge who heard all the libelant’s witnesses and the more important ones called by the claimant. Decree affirmed, with costs.