General
Re SAM WOOD, ED SUMMERFIELD, A. D. ROSS and CHARLES SUTTON
18 Ariz. 527163 Pac. 268·Arizona Supreme Court·1917·AZ
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Filed February 26, 1917.]
[163 Pac. 268.]
Re SAM WOOD, ED SUMMERFIELD, A. D. ROSS and CHARLES SUTTON.
Original applications for admission to bail.
Applications denied.
Messrs. Doan & Doan, for Applicants.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Application for bail is made in behalf of the following named defendants, to wit: Sam Wood, Ed Summerfield, A. D. Ross and Charles Sutton. The application in each case is original, and in all respects similar to that in Be Paul Welisch, ante, p. 517, 163 Pac. 264, just decided, and on the authority of that case it is ordered that the application in each of said cases be and the same is hereby denied.
[CONCURRENCE — CUNNINGHAM, J.]
CUNNINGHAM, J.
(Specially Concurring). — I concur in the order denying the applications for bail, for the reasons stated by me in Be Paul Welisch, ante, p. 517, 163 Pac. 264, decided at the same time with this cause.