Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of the Board of Street Opening and Improvement of the City of New York to Acquire Title to Perry Avenue from the Southern Boulevard to Mosholu Parkway in the City of New York. James Dunne, Appellant; The City of New York et al., Respondents, 1903 — 175 N.Y. 515 · caselaw · US
Corporations
In the Matter of the Application of the Board of Street Opening and Improvement of the City of New York to Acquire Title to Perry Avenue from the Southern Boulevard to Mosholu Parkway in the City of New York. James Dunne, Appellant; The City of New York et al., Respondents
175 N.Y. 515·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of the Board of Street Opening and Improvement of the City of New York to Acquire Title to Perry Avenue from the Southern Boulevard to Mosholu Parkway in the City of New York. James Dunne, Appellant; The City of New York et al., Respondents.
Matter of Perry Avenue, 82 App. Div. 636, affirmed.
(Argued June 3, 1903;
decided June 23, 1903.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 15,1903, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming the report of commissioners-of estimate and assessment herein.
Charles W. Dayton and John J. Clark for appellant.
George L. Rives, Corporation Gov/nsel {Theodore Connoly, John P. Dunn and Thomas C. Blake of counsel), for City of New York, respondent.
John C. Shaw for Thomas Dunn respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Cullen and Werner, JJ.