Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Cudahy Packing Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Minnesota, 1910 — 215 U.S. 618 · caselaw · US
General
Cudahy Packing Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Minnesota
215 U.S. 618·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 175.
Cudahy Packing Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Minnesota.
January 18, 1910.
Mr. Moritz Heim for plaintiff in error. Mr. E.,T. Young, Mr. George W. Petei'son and Mr. Al J: Smith for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY]
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota.
Dismissed, per stipulation.