Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sigmont Simon, Appellant, v. Jennie Simon, Respondent, 1899 — 159 N.Y. 549 · caselaw · US
General
Sigmont Simon, Appellant, v. Jennie Simon, Respondent
159 N.Y. 549·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sigmont Simon, Appellant, v. Jennie Simon, Respondent.
Simon v. Simon, 6 App. Div. 469, affirmed.
(Argued May 4, 1899;
decided June 6, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 20, 1896, upon an order affirming a judgment of the late Superior Court of the city of New York in favor of defendant entered upon a decision pf the court on trial at Special Term.
A. H. Hummel for appellant.
Samuel Greenbamn for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.