General
Booth v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent
385 U.S. 936·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 206,
Mise.
Booth v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent.
Petitioner pro se.
John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Stephen C. Way and Paul J. Murphy, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Sup. Ct. Wash. Certiorari denied.