General
GILDER v. HASTY, PROBATE JUDGE
195 Ala. 690·Alabama Supreme Court·1915·AL
Anderson, C. J., McClellan, Mayfield, and Somerville,' JJ., concur. · Sayre, J., dissents.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GILDER v. HASTY, PROBATE JUDGE.
(Decided December 16, 1915,)
Appeal from Marengo Law and Equity Court.
Heard before Hon. R. I. Jones, Special Judge.
McDaniel & Whitfield, and N. D. Denson & Sons, for appellant. No counsel marked for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Gardner, J.]
Gardner, J.
This case is ruled by the decision in Smith v. Stiles, infra, 70 South. 905, in which it was held that Marengo constituted a separate circuit. On the authority of that case judgment must be reversed and judgment rendered granting prayer of petitioner requiring the probate judge to place his name upon the ballot as a candidate for judge of that circuit.
Anderson, C. J., McClellan, Mayfield, and Somerville,' JJ., concur.
Sayre, J., dissents.