General
MAULL v. L. B. SKINNER MFG. CO.; FLORIDA CITRUS SUPPLY CO. v. SAME
237 F. 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1917
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MAULL v. L. B. SKINNER MFG. CO. FLORIDA CITRUS SUPPLY CO. v. SAME.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
January 24, 1917.)
Nos. 3001, 3002.
Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida; Rhydon M. Call, Judge.
George C. Bedell and F. M. Durrance, both of Jacksonville, Fla., for appellants. T. Hart Anderson, of New York City, and L. W. Baldwin, of Jacksonville, Fla., for appellee.
Before PARDEE and WALKER, Circuit Judges, and GRUBB, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
These two cases, involving the same questions, were heard together. We find no reversible error, and the two decrees are affirmed. See Campbell v. Skinner, 236 Fed. 359.