Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota, 1958 — 355 U.S. 911 · caselaw · US
General
Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota
355 U.S. 911·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 606.
Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. Minnesota.
Joseph A. Maun and Earl Smith for appellant. Miles Lord, Attorney General of Minnesota, Perry Voidness, Assistant Attorney General, and Arthur C. Roemer, Special Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Minnesota. Probable jurisdiction noted.