Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Huguenot National Bank of New Paltz, Respondent, v. Alexander Studwell et al., Appellants, 1878 — 74 N.Y. 621 · caselaw · US
Corporations
The Huguenot National Bank of New Paltz, Respondent, v. Alexander Studwell et al., Appellants
74 N.Y. 621·New York Court of Appeals·1878·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Huguenot National Bank of New Paltz, Respondent, v. Alexander Studwell et al., Appellants.
On the appointment of a receiver of a manufacturing company, the corporation is so far dissolved that thereafter the duty is no longer upon the trustees to make the annual report.
Accordingly held, where a receiver was appointed during and before the expiration of the twenty days in which the trustees were required to make such report, that they were not liable to the penalty imposed by the general manufacturing act (§ 12, chap. 40, Laws of 1848) for failure to make and file the same.
(Argued May 30, 1878;
decided November 12, 1878.)
Samuel Hand for appellants.
JST. H Halbert for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam]
Per Curiam
opinion for reversal and new trial.
All concur, except Miller, J., absent at argument, and Folger, J., dissenting.
Judgment reversed.