Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lowell M. PALMER, Jr., Owner of Yacht Hirondelle, Formerly Onima, Appellant, v. R. B. COWELL, Trading as Hague Machine Works, and Forrest & Dunn, Incorporated, Corporation, Appellees, 1927 — 22 F.2d 1017 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Lowell M. PALMER, Jr., Owner of Yacht Hirondelle, Formerly Onima, Appellant, v. R. B. COWELL, Trading as Hague Machine Works, and Forrest & Dunn, Incorporated, Corporation, Appellees
22 F.2d 1017·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1927
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lowell M. PALMER, Jr., Owner of Yacht Hirondelle, Formerly Onima, Appellant, v. R. B. COWELL, Trading as Hague Machine Works, and Forrest & Dunn, Incorporated, Corporation, Appellees.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
September 27, 1927.
No. 2648.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Norfolk Division of the Eastern District of Virginia.
H. Dudley Bierau, of New York City, and James E. Heath, of Norfolk, Va., for appellant.
Kelsey & Jett, of Norfolk, Va., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
In Admiralty. Cause dismissed, at cost of appellant, under rule 20, per agreement of counsel.