General

Ahtanum Irrigation District et al. v. United States; and United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation District et al.

381 U.S. 924·Supreme Court of the United States·1965

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

No. 1026. No. 1035. Ahtanum Irrigation District et al. v. United States; and United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation District et al. Fred C. Palmer, John Gavin, Northcutt Ely and Jerome C. Muys for Ahtanum Irrigation District et al., and John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Charles B. Roe, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Washington, petitioners in No. 1026. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Williams, Roger P. Marquis and Edmund B. Clark for the United States in both cases. Charles B. Roe, Jr., Assistant Attorney General of Washington, for the State of Washington, respondent in No. 1035. [MAJORITY] C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 330 F. 2d 897; 338 F. 2d 307.