General

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Durell Smallwood, Appellant

225 A.D.2d 713639 N.Y.S.2d 938·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1996·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Durell Smallwood, Appellant. [639 NYS2d 938] [MAJORITY] We reject the defendant’s contention that he was denied a fundamental right to be present at all material stages of the trial by his exclusion from numerous sidebar discussions with prospective jurors during voir dire (see, People v Antommarchi, 80 NY2d 247; People v Sloan, 79 NY2d 386). The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to be present when, prior to the commencement of voir dire, his trial counsel informed the court, in the defendant’s presence, that he had discussed the matter with the defendant and that the defendant agreed to waive his right to be present (see, People v Ming Yuen, 222 AD2d 613; People v Stokes, 216 AD2d 337; People v Spruill, 212 AD2d 381; People v Perez, 196 AD2d 781; see also, People v Underwood, 201 AD2d 597). Mangano, P. J., Miller, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.