Administrative

Christopher PERRY, Petitioner, v. SISSETON-WAHPETON SIOUX TRIBE, Respondent, and concerning Alondra Perry, A Minor Child

3 Am. Tribal Law 422·Appellate Court of the Hopi Tribe·2001

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Christopher PERRY, Petitioner, v. SISSETON-WAHPETON SIOUX TRIBE, Respondent, and concerning Alondra Perry, A Minor Child. No. 01AP000009. Appellate Court of the Hopi Tribe. Sept. 24, 2001. Center for Indian Law, D. Jeffery Pro-teica, Winslow, AZ, for Petitioner. General Counsel, Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe, Agency Village, SD, for Respondent. [MAJORITY] ORDER The Hopi Appellate Court upon review of the Expedited Petition for an Extraordinary Writ For Temporary Preliminary Injunction on the above matter denies said petition. This action is premature. This court is not aware of any Petition before the trial court to recognize and enforce the challenged Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribal Court Order; therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED denying the Petitioner for Extraordinary Writ. SO ORDERED.