Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Clark et ux. v. Dwyer, Director of Agriculture of the State of Washington, 1961 — 364 U.S. 932 · caselaw · US
General
Clark et ux. v. Dwyer, Director of Agriculture of the State of Washington
364 U.S. 932·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 531.
Clark et ux. v. Dwyer, Director of Agriculture of the State of Washington.
Cutler W. Halverson for petitioners. John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Ernest M. Furnia and Richard M. Montecucco, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Supreme Court
of Washington. Certiorari denied.