Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re WAYSIDE FURNITURE CO., Bankrupt. WINNEBAGO MFG. CO., Appellant, v. Julius J. GOETZ, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Wayside Furniture Co., Appellee, 1933 — 67 F.2d 203 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
In re WAYSIDE FURNITURE CO., Bankrupt. WINNEBAGO MFG. CO., Appellant, v. Julius J. GOETZ, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Wayside Furniture Co., Appellee
67 F.2d 203·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re WAYSIDE FURNITURE CO., Bankrupt. WINNEBAGO MFG. CO., Appellant, v. Julius J. GOETZ, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Wayside Furniture Co., Appellee.
No. 4908.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Sept. 23, 1933.
I. A. Fish, G. R. Hoffman, J. H. Marshutz, and E. H. Hallows, all of Milwaukee, Wis., for appellant.
I. E. Goldberg, of Milwaukee, Wis., for appellee.
Before ALSCHULER and SPARKS, Circuit Judges, and WELKERS ON, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — WILKERSON, District Judge. .]
WILKERSON, District Judge. .
This is an appeal from an order denying the right to reclaim certain furniture under a contract similar in all substantial respects to tbe one in Union Furniture Company v. Julius J. Goetz, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Wayside Furniture Company, Bankrupt (C. C. A.) 67 F.(2d) 201, decided September 23, 1933. Tbe contract was not filed for record. Tbe contract in our opinion is not a consignment contract as appellant contends.
Tbe judgment of tbe District Court is affirmed.