General
MARIA A. VANDEFORD v. C. F. FOSTER
62 Cal. 179·Supreme Court of California·1882·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[No. 8,593.
Department One.]
November 23, 1882.
MARIA A. VANDEFORD v. C. F. FOSTER.
Verdict—Jury—Issues—New Trial—Excessive Damages.
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, in the Superior Court of the County of Tehama. Mayhew, J.
The facts in this case are similar to those stated in Garlich v. Bower, ante, 65.
Chipman <& Garter, for Appellant.
Jerome Banhs and Charles R. Ba/rry, for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — The Court:]
The Court:
On the authority of Garlich v. Bower, ante, 65, order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial reversed and cause remanded.