Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Clara H. Price, Respondent, v. Stephen M. Ga Nun et al. Appellants, 1895 — 147 N.Y. 698 · caselaw · US
General
Clara H. Price, Respondent, v. Stephen M. Ga Nun et al. Appellants
147 N.Y. 698·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Clara H. Price, Respondent, v. Stephen M. Ga Nun et al. Appellants.
(Argued October 7, 1895;
decided October 15, 1895.)
Motion to open default in filing the return herein and permitting the filing of such return.
Brainard Tolies for motion.
George B. Beattys opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Ordered, if defendants pay plaintiff’s attorney the ordinary costs of appeal in this court on or before the 18th day of October, 1895, the order dismissing the appeal herein is vacated and defendants are at liberty to file return with the clerk of this court on or before October 25, 1895, mmo pro tune as of the time default was made in filing same. If costs are not paid as above required this motion is denied, with ten dollars costs.