Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George Bowman, Appellant, v. Jacob Travis, impleaded, etc., Respondent, 1873 — 54 N.Y. 640 · caselaw · US
Property · MBE-tested
George Bowman, Appellant, v. Jacob Travis, impleaded, etc., Respondent
54 N.Y. 640·New York Commission of Appeals·1873·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George Bowman, Appellant, v. Jacob Travis, impleaded, etc., Respondent.
(Argued March 8, 1873;
decided June term, 1873.)
This was an action brought to recover for professional services as attorney and counselor, rendered by plaintiff. Defendant Travis alone defended. He and defendant Mersereau were tenants in common of a farm on Staten Island, occupied by defendant Watson ás their tenant. The latter, in obedience to an order of Mersereau, moved a division fence between the farm and the adjoining one, owned by one Winants, a few feet on land claimed by the latter, who thereupon brought ejectment against Watson. Mersereau directed Watson to employ a lawyer to defend the action, who employed plaintiff. Mersereau informed Travis of the bringing of the action, and suggested the employment of plaintiff. Travis refused to employ or sanction his employment. The ejectment suit was subsequently settled. Held, that defendant Travis was in no way responsible for the wrong committed by Watson, and was not liable to plaintiff for defending the suit which grew out of it, and that the complaint was rightfully dismissed as to him.
George W. Miller for the appellant.
Wilson M. Powell for the respondent.
[MAJORITY — Gray, C.,]
Gray, C.,
reads for affirmance.
All concur; Reynolds, C., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.