Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nicole A. DALMAZZI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES., 2018 — 138 S. Ct. 576 · caselaw · US
General
Nicole A. DALMAZZI, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
138 S. Ct. 576199 L. Ed. 2d 452·Supreme Court of the United States·2018
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nicole A. DALMAZZI, petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 16-961.
Supreme Court of the United States
Jan. 5, 2018.
The motion of Professor Aditya Bamzai for enlargement of time for oral argument, for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted, and the time is divided as follows: 30 minutes for petitioners, 10 minutes for Professor Aditya Bamzai, and 30 minutes for respondent.