General
England et ux. v. United States
382 U.S. 986·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 603.
England et ux. v. United States.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Ernest Rubenstein for petitioners.
Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts and I. Henry Kutz for the United States.
Briefs of amici curiae, in support of the petition, were filed by Graham W. McGowan for the Electronic Industries Association; by John R. Turney, Jr., for the Manufacturing Chemists’ Association, Inc.; by George R. Fearon and Richard B. Barker for the Associated Industries of New York State, Inc.; and by Lambert H. Miller for the National Association of Manufacturers of the United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.