Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Anna M. Hedstrom et al., Appellants, v. George D. Harris et al., Respondents, 1907 — 187 N.Y. 521 · caselaw · US
General
Anna M. Hedstrom et al., Appellants, v. George D. Harris et al., Respondents
187 N.Y. 521·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Anna M. Hedstrom et al., Appellants, v. George D. Harris et al., Respondents.
Hedstrom v. Harris, 108 App. Div. 358, affirmed.
(Argued December 17, 1906;
decided January 8, 1907.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 13, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict directed by the court in an action to recover an amount alleged to be due for goods sold and delivered.
George P. Keating and William A. Douglas for appellants.
Patrick C. Dugan for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Werner and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Gray, J. Not voting: Edward T. Bartlett, J. Not sitting: Hiscock, J.