IP
M. J. O'CONNOR v. B. F. GOOD et al.; M. J. O'CONNOR v. DANIEL HAZARD et al.
60 Cal. 622·Supreme Court of California·1882·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[No. 7,965-7,966.
In Bank.]
June 29, 1882.
M. J. O’CONNOR v. B. F. GOOD et al.; M. J. O’CON-NOR v. DANIEL HAZARD et al.
State Patent—State Lands—Jurisdiction of Land Officers.—Affirmed on the authority of O’Gonnor v. Frasher, 56 Cal. 499.
Appeals from judgments for the plaintiffs, and from orders denying new trials, in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Hines, J.
Will. D. Gould and James H. Blanchard, for Appellants.
John D. Bicknell, for Respondents.
[MAJORITY — The Court:]
The Court:
The facts, as they appear from the records of these cases, are identical with those in the record of the case of O’Connor v. Frasher et al., 56 Cal. 499, and, upon the authority of that case, the judgments in these cases are affirmed.
Myrick. J., dissented.