Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Peter Faltisko, Respondent, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Appellant, 1897 — 151 N.Y. 650 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Peter Faltisko, Respondent, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Appellant
151 N.Y. 650·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Peter Faltisko, Respondent, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Appellant.
Faltisko y. 2V”. T., L. E. c6 W. 22. 22. Go., 12 Mise. Bep. 478, affirmed.
(Submitted December 14, 1896;
decided January 19, 1897.)
Appeal from an order of the General Term of the Superior Court of Buffalo, entered July 12, 1895, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion to set aside service of a summons.
George F. Brownell for appellant.
Frank, A. Abbott for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Andrews, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien and Haight, JJ. Dissent: Bartlett, Martin and Vann, JJ.