General
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
352 U.S. 891·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 369.
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
G. R. Redding and William E. Miller for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Melvin Richter, Bernard Cedarbaum, William W. Gatchell and Robert L. Russell for the Federal Power Commission, and Charles V. Shannon, Arthur R. Seder, Jr., Donald R. Richberg and Oscar L. Chapman for the Michigan Consolidated Gas Co., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.