Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
MILLS NOVELTY COMPANY, Plaintlff-Appellee, v. John F. O'RYAN, as Commissioner of the Police Department of the City of New York et al., Defendants-Appellants, 1934 — 68 F.2d 1009 · caselaw · US
General
MILLS NOVELTY COMPANY, Plaintlff-Appellee, v. John F. O'RYAN, as Commissioner of the Police Department of the City of New York et al., Defendants-Appellants
68 F.2d 1009·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MILLS NOVELTY COMPANY, Plaintlff-Appellee, v. John F. O’RYAN, as Commissioner of the Police Department of the City of New York et al., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 286.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Feb. 13, 1934.
For opinion below, see, 3 F. Supp. 968.
Paul Windels, Corp. Counsel, of New York City (Paxton Blair, Alvin McKinley Sylvester, and Lotos Weintraub, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.
Kaufman, Weitzner & Coller, of New York City (Charles H. Tuttle, of New York City, of counsel), appellee.
Before MANTON, L, HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CTJRIAM.]
PER CTJRIAM.
Affirmed on the authority of Mills Novelty Co. v. Farrell (C. C. A.) 64 F.(2d) 476, and People v. Jennings, 257 N. Y. 196, 177 N. E. 419.