General
Sarah A. Swift, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. The Staten Island Rapid Transit Railroad Company, Appellant
135 N.Y. 650·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sarah A. Swift, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. The Staten Island Rapid Transit Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued October 10, 1892;
decided October 25, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made the second Monday of February, 1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Albert B. Boardmam, for appellant.
James O. Foley for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on decision on former appeal. (123 N. Y. 646.)
All concur, except Gray, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.