General
State of Connecticut v. William J. Peay
173 Conn. 759·Connecticut Supreme Court·1977·CT
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
State of Connecticut v. William J. Peay
George D. Stoughton, state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).
Mary V. McCarthy, for the appellant (defendant).
Argued June 7
decided June 7, 1977
[MAJORITY]
It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that unless the defendant files his assignment of errors on or before June 27,1977, the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.