Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Co., 1944 — 322 U.S. 757 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Co.
322 U.S. 757·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 949.
United States v. Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Co.
May 29, 1944.
Solicitor General Fahy for the United States.
Messrs. Louis W. Myers, William W. Clary, Joseph F. Mann, T. W. Bockes, and Henry M. Isaacs for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certi-orari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.